Quote:
Originally Posted by b0son
Point is, there are a lot of behaviours or factors that impair drivers. Just because some can be easily policed doesn't mean those pinged for them are necessarily manifestly unsafe. IMO, the penalties should fit the risk, so a 0.05-0.08 would be an on-the-spot fine and you're on your way. Statistically at least, it doesn't warrant being dragged before the courts. And as I've mentioned elsewhere, it's hypocritical of the police when they refuse to attend actual crashes.
|
I'm not arguing that there aren't other factors but alcohol levels are certainly one of those and one which we can police. Some States (albeit only SA and WA) agree with you and don't suspend for low level offences choosing to issue a TIN instead.
If NSW drivers think these changes are bad, wait until you catch up with Victoria which not only offers a 90 day immediate suspension for a low level offence (which is also only 0.05-0.69) but also mandates all offending drivers attend a drink driver behaviour change program; enforces a Zero BAC requirement for a minimum of 3 years and insists drivers enter the alcohol interlock program for at least 6 months after their suspension ends. Total cost for a < 0.69 BAC offence is thus $2,880 of which only $496 is the actual fine!