Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2012, 09:16 AM   #1
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,307
Smile Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Good Friday the missus and I drove from Briz to Rockhampton.
BF Mk2 Ghia 6, used 49.44l in 651 kms. no BS !!!
Thats : 13.17km/l. 37.21mpg. or 7.59 l per 100kms.
I know there are a lot of roadworks and we had to slow down. But thats phenomanal economy..Ecolpi or Ecoboost would be hard to beat that.
Then, driving around Rocky and out to Yeppoon a few times, it did..
10.22km/l or 28.89 mpg or 9.78l per 100kms.

__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 08-04-2012, 09:21 AM   #2
DJM83
Barra Turbo > V8
Donating Member3
 
DJM83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,731
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

On recent trips i struggled to get my tuned Focus below 9 so thats pretty good going.
__________________
-2011 XR6 Turbo Ute - Lux Pack - M6
-2022 Hyundai Tucson Highlander Diesel N Line
DJM83 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 09:25 AM   #3
Benjamin Smith
Regular Member
 
Benjamin Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toowoomba, QLD
Posts: 227
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Yep they sure are, i should get from toowoomba to Bathurst this year on one tank in my ute, im going to give it a red hot go anyway
Benjamin Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 09:27 AM   #4
cs123
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
cs123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Morayfield
Posts: 27,906
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: Can't think of anyone more deserving. Russ Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For all the technical support behind the scenes. Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Technical submission 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

That's good. I use to always stop at GinGin for fuel in my AU and BA turbo. I could never get those figures.
__________________
I love Holdens....
cs123 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 09:48 AM   #5
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,277
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by csv8
Good Friday the missus and I drove from Briz to Rockhampton.
BF Mk2 Ghia 6, used 49.44l in 651 kms. no BS !!!
Thats : 13.17km/l. 37.21mpg. or 7.59 l per 100kms.
I know there are a lot of roadworks and we had to slow down. But thats phenomanal economy..Ecolpi or Ecoboost would be hard to beat that.
Then, driving around Rocky and out to Yeppoon a few times, it did..
10.22km/l or 28.89 mpg or 9.78l per 100kms.
Excellent.
I've done that trip many times in FG R6 Ute with 5-speed auto, best I got was 8.2 l/100 km but not complaining.
Ecoboost promises almost 20% better fuel economy again so everyone is keen to see it up against Omega...

Extra urban for FG II

I-6 Petrol 7.2 l/100km
EcoLPI 8.7 l/100km
Ecoboost 6.0 l/100km

Extra urban for VE
Omega 3.0 SIDI 6.9 l/100km (Not as good as Ecoboost)
SV6 3.6 SIDI 7.6 l/100km (not as good as XR6)

Last edited by jpd80; 08-04-2012 at 09:54 AM.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 09:55 AM   #6
Nic85
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 677
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

About the same figures as my 380. I'd be curious as to your average speed?

I do Sunshine Coast - Brisbane for work every day. My 380 will consistantly do 7.8-8.2L/100km depending on which the wind is blowing sitting on the speed limit. Sitting on 100km/h instead of 110km/h improves economy into the low 7's.

Good economy for big cars, no doubt. Our diesel ASX on the same trip does 5.1-5.4L/100km, and our ix35 does 6.3-6.7L/100km.
Nic85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 10:04 AM   #7
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,307
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Nic85, We kept to the speed limits, not wanting a photo from Constable Kodak. !!! Plenty of cops on the road!!! There are a lot of road works on the Bruce Highway and they don't take the lower speed signs down, when not working!! Plus there are sections of 90kms "Crash Zones" ???. Allowing comfort stops etc we did it in 8 hours. Taking out comfort stops,,around 7 hours for the trip...
Ghia has 93,000kms on the clock..tyres are Goodyear Efficiency Grip.
__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 08-04-2012, 10:06 AM   #8
Nic85
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 677
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Good effort mate.

I sometimes think I'll sell my car and buy something a bit better on fuel, but when you're doing around 8L/100km on the highway, and take into consideration the extra comfort and space of a bigger car, the extra $10 or so a week of fuel saving hardly seems worth it.
Nic85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 08-04-2012, 10:09 AM   #9
2.8L Hilux
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2.8L Hilux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 512
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

That's excellent figures. Good thing about the ZF box, in 6th gear doing 100kph the engine is only turning over at 1500rpm.
__________________
Ford Territory Titanium | SZ 4.0L
Toyota Century | GZG50 5.0L V12
2.8L Hilux is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 10:19 AM   #10
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,277
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I have a feeling that large car fuel economy experienced by owners stuck in peak hour traffic crawl
is much more telling on their purchasing decisions than what highway economy figures are.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 08-04-2012, 10:25 AM   #11
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by csv8
Plus there are sections of 90kms "Crash Zones" ???.
Crash zones were a little invention by a previous government to put off actually fixing the road which costs money that could be better spent on "important" things. Another was the installation of traffic lights in the middle of nowhere on bridges that they decided to downgrade to single lane. By default these lights are red in both directions and only go green after they detect you so as you are travelling at 100km/h you ALWAYS have to stop.

I suspect they thought these were far enough out of Brisbane that they would not annoy or inconvenience anyone "important" and have little effect on elections results.......
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 10:27 AM   #12
Nic85
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 677
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
I have a feeling that large car fuel economy experienced by owners stuck in peak hour traffic crawl
is much more telling on their purchasing decisions than what highway economy figures are.
It depends of course on what type of driving you do. For me, I generally drive outside peak times, only hitting traffic some mornings on the Gateway motorway if I'm 5 minutes late. Bit of a crawl for 5 minutes or so does nothing really to economy.

If you're stuck in traffic every day, and crawl to work the whole way, I'd suggest either getting a diesel, or take the bus/train.
Nic85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 10:54 AM   #13
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,307
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My fuel range http://s1197.photobucket.com/albums/...t=DSC00077.jpg
__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 11:18 AM   #14
DJM83
Barra Turbo > V8
Donating Member3
 
DJM83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,731
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

In my old TE50 i seen 800+ aswell, they arent as bad as people let on.
__________________
-2011 XR6 Turbo Ute - Lux Pack - M6
-2022 Hyundai Tucson Highlander Diesel N Line
DJM83 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 08-04-2012, 11:43 AM   #15
Rodp
Regular Schmuck
 
Rodp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,640
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Mine's moderately fine on the open road. It's stop and start traffic that kills me.
Rodp is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 11:59 AM   #16
J.C.
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: On a knifes edge!
Posts: 3,407
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by csv8
Good Friday the missus and I drove from Briz to Rockhampton.
BF Mk2 Ghia 6, used 49.44l in 651 kms. no BS !!!
Thats : 13.17km/l. 37.21mpg. or 7.59 l per 100kms.
I know there are a lot of roadworks and we had to slow down. But thats phenomanal economy..Ecolpi or Ecoboost would be hard to beat that.
Then, driving around Rocky and out to Yeppoon a few times, it did..
10.22km/l or 28.89 mpg or 9.78l per 100kms.
That's pretty good...................and that's going up hill too
J.C. is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 12:04 PM   #17
EgoFalcon
The Villan
 
EgoFalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NSW, SW Sydney
Posts: 1,086
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I find the falcons on long distances very economical compared to alot of cars. From Picton to Nelsons bay FG XR6 Turbo (yes a turbo) ended up doing 7.8L per 100 km's.
__________________
New addition! 2010 FG XR50 Turbo in Lightning Strike

The PX Ranger has arrived! XLT Metropolitean Grey

Previous Ride - 2007 BF MK II XR6 in Lightning Strike
EgoFalcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 08-04-2012, 12:07 PM   #18
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,277
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nic85

If you're stuck in traffic every day, and crawl to work the whole way, I'd suggest either getting a diesel, or take the bus/train.
I only live 5 minutes from work and avoid most traffic by using suburban connection roads...

On a trip to Sydney a few years back, I happened to be on a bus during morning peak hour rush
and noticed just how many single occupant vehicles there were...nearly all of them.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 12:29 PM   #19
vanman_75
XD Sundowner
 
vanman_75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: moranbah
Posts: 1,078
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

With an au as my work hack , it sees 8-9 as normal ( spirited) and long trips on or just above speed limit 7s , I struggled to get my swift under that on highway , they are made for urban , and falcon is made to cruise ....swap those cars each way and the results change .

Just can't beat the falcon / commondore for those highway miles
__________________
something old something blue
vanman_75 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 12:35 PM   #20
NCF302
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 223
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

i drove from melb - bris in my bf xr8 6 speed auto over fri-sat. (i just moved here)
i averaged 10.6 litres per hundred k's at an average speed over the whole trip of 97 km/h. it was 18 hours of driving time.
wasn't too bad for the big v8, i didn't exactly do the speed limit the whole way so would of been a bit better if i did.
__________________
NEW FG G6E Turbo - Ego and Stock standard. For now...

OLD BF XR8 - 6 Speed auto, luxury pack, momo steering wheel, 3 inch exhaust in DeJa Vu Green. on king ultras with FG GT-P 335 20's

OLDER NC Fairlane Ghia - 5 Litre, Auto, Exhaust, Wood Momo Steering Wheel, Ultra Low Kings all round, 19" BA GT-P Wheels, NCF-302 plates. Miss it the most!

Others include - Mint 5L DC LTD - 5L 5 Speed NC (FOR SALE) - XF S-Pac - XD GL Wagon
NCF302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 12:44 PM   #21
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I get 14L/100km if i'm lucky driving urban. I thrashed my old Pulsar everywhere and the worst it ever did, anywhere, was 11L/100km
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 01:48 PM   #22
Kevaclone
Regular Member
 
Kevaclone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Beachmere, QLD
Posts: 461
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Few years ago I did a Sunshine Coast to Gosford and back in our old BA XT sedan
me, missus and two teenagers and younger son, boot full of luggage for the family for two days

drove all night at 105 and 115kph, A/C on and cruise on
next day went to Newcastle and did a bit of sightseeing(someone had parked a bloody big red boat on the beach) and got stuck in the massive traffic jam to and from the beach and then headed home

entire trip the car averaged 9.9L/100klm

pretty good for a car full and not driven lightly

My trayback ute on the other hand, same engine/gearbox/diff ratio is flat out managing less than 11L/100kph at 105kph. Strangely enough with the tray sides on and at 120kph it gets around 9L/100klm, sadly there is nowhere that I drive that I can do that speed
__________________
03 BA XLS 6cyl Ute-Mercury Silver
04 Subaru Liberty GT Premium
99 Toyota 105 series Cruiser TD
99 5.8M Profish plate alloy carport decoration
Kevaclone is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 01:50 PM   #23
baboon
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Geelong, VIC
Posts: 5,265
Contributor: For members who make a contribution worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: went to the trouble of posting up some great Vids of the AFF drag meet 
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Thats superb economy figures. Wonder if you'd get the same Rocky to Briz? Assuming Briz to Rocky is downhill all the way!
baboon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 02:01 PM   #24
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman_75
With an au as my work hack , it sees 8-9 as normal ( spirited) and long trips on or just above speed limit 7s , I struggled to get my swift under that on highway , they are made for urban , and falcon is made to cruise ....swap those cars each way and the results change .

Just can't beat the falcon / commondore for those highway miles
yes it`s interesting that some of the economy sardine cans are good in the city but are pretty average on the highway, some of it i put down to the need for them to rev their bits of because they have bugger all torque,
long live big cars !!!
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 02:08 PM   #25
jixel 78
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 322
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My Sportwagons`fuel gauge is a slug. The BAs is heaps faster.
__________________
XC GXL Warm 351c AOD
09 VE SV6 Sportwagon
BA Fairmont Ghia
jixel 78 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 02:24 PM   #26
Jack960
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Jack960's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,031
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

My n/a XR6 6 speed manual averages 6.8L/100km on the highway and 12.8L/100km round town. Can't complain for 175rwkw.
Jack960 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 02:28 PM   #27
Nic85
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 677
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.C.
That's pretty good...................and that's going up hill too
I know you're only being funny, but Brisbane to Rocky is actually downhill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by baboon
Thats superb economy figures. Wonder if you'd get the same Rocky to Briz? Assuming Briz to Rocky is downhill all the way!
As above.
Nic85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 02:39 PM   #28
Burnout
Falcon RTV - FG G6ET
Donating Member3
 
Burnout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In Da Bush, QLD
Posts: 31,291
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.C.
That's pretty good...................and that's going up hill too
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nic85
I know you're only being funny, but Brisbane to Rocky is actually downhill.
No it's not, everyone knows north is up! As in, "We're driving up to Rocky."
Just look at a map, Rocky is up!
__________________
BAII RTV - with Raptor V S/C.

RTV Power
FG G6ET 50th Anniversary in Sensation.
While the basic Ford Six was code named Barra, the Turbo version clearly deserved its very own moniker – again enter Gordon Barfield.
We asked him if the engine had actually been called “Seagull” and how that came about.
“Actually it was just call “Gull”, because I named it that. Because we knew it was going to poo on everything”.
Burnout is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 02:42 PM   #29
Martyvan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Martyvan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane North
Posts: 1,994
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

I remember once when i was younger getting high 9's in the old mans au fairmont....just made rocky on the tank. Same trip in my diesel pajero got 10 neat. My wifes corolla wagon in the city gets 11.5 to 12 litres per 100....... Pajero gets 13 on school drop off run....

That is great economy.... Cant wait to see some eb I4 results in the real world :-)
Martyvan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-04-2012, 02:53 PM   #30
SVR73
Mr Polish
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Across the road from Speedway City
Posts: 1,977
Default Re: Falcons are Uneconomical ?? Mine's Not !!

best figures I got with my first AU - the forte 4.0 Litre. 6 and a bit litres per 100 km, 1175 kilometres to a tank with no cruise control
SVR73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL