![]() |
|
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
Nutty Professor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 548
|
Lo all
I keep hearing things about Front Wheel Drive cars and how they are more fuel and space efficient and so on and so forth. Everyone who builds them (pretty much every car maker nowadays - even Ford has the godawful Taurus) seems to quietly omit the fact that Front Wheel Drive is dynamically unstable for anything larger or heavier than a Corolla, and borderline dangerous for a large car like a Magna. I had a think about it, and I reckon I've figured it out. Why doesn't someone build a car where the FWD drivetrain is in the boot, powering the rear wheels, and the front of the car would be the cargo space? Think Toyota MR2. Or Lotus Evora. Still just as efficient and cheap and practical, but more stable. It could even be called 'sporty' as technically the engine would be in the middle, as a FWD engine sits forward of the driven axle. 4 doors, mid mounted V6, rear wheel drive, no loss of cabin space or cargo space, or economy. Who wouldn't be tempted by that? Am I the only one that thinks this is a good idea?
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |