|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-07-2014, 03:34 PM
|
#11 | |||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 618
|
Quote:
That's interesting and it explains why the HSV that Drive tested got to 190 kph at 400 metres compared to the 186.7 kph that Wheels got in the current issue from the Ford, and that's in spite of the HSV apparently being around 40 kg's heavier. Looking closely at the Dyno graph, it seems that the HSV is stronger below peak revs as well as having more power at the end. The first HSV tests made it look to me that the car was well short of it's claimed power,but this Dyno result plus the Drive 400 metre end speed have changed my mind. |
|||
|
Re: FPV GT-F outpowers HSV GTS The Aussie horsepower king has been identified & we are surprised as any1
Threaded Mode