Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-08-2008, 03:15 PM   #1
madmelon
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,334
Default E-gas to get DSC in H1 2009

Just read this news on carpoint. I've seen it mentioned a few times that you can't have TC/DSC and gas coz it'd backfire. Am I the only person who thinks this implies that there's a new gas system coming out for the Falcon next year?

http://carpoint.com.au/car-review/2970254.aspx

madmelon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-08-2008, 03:20 PM   #2
Cobra
Bear with a sore head
 
Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,701
Default

It's either incorrect or it's incorrect. It won't get DSC with the old LPG system and it won't get a new LPG system with only a year and a half of life left in the I6 (from 1st Jan 09).
Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-08-2008, 07:36 PM   #3
AUXRVIII
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,463
Default

If an engine has petrol injection, then it can have LPG injection. An system fitted to an I6 can easily be reconfigured to work on a V6.
AUXRVIII is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-08-2008, 08:49 PM   #4
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Going by the current emissions laws it would have to be Euro 4 emissions compliant, and I can't see Ford going to the effort of emissions compliance for such a short amount of time.

All development on the I6 was cancelled last year.

The only thing I can think of is if somehow they have modified the DSC/TC to work with the current system.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-08-2008, 10:07 PM   #5
JPFS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JPFS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community. 
Default

hhmmm.... well there's something being prepared... ;) and it's not only engines...
JPFS1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-08-2008, 11:24 PM   #6
jornsmith
jornsmith
 
jornsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: in the gutter
Posts: 144
Default

hi guys. for those of us who don't know, why can't the lpg system be paired with dsc/tc?
__________________
: LIFES A GAME SO PLAY IT
jornsmith is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-08-2008, 11:41 PM   #7
Whitey-AMG
AWD Assassin
 
Whitey-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,170
Default

Well my understanding is that the LPG by passes the Injectors in a standard VAPOUR LPG system.....( as opposed to a SVI LPG system )

TC / DSC works by cutting fuel to the engine via injector / spark cut out when it senses slip / traction loss etc. By cutting engine power , the TC / DSC can work to regain the cars balance / traction loss issues.

The issue with LPG systems that bypass the injectors, is that with TC activated, the car doesn't realise that the LPG is still flowing into the cylinder ( bypassing the injectors ). In doing so, you get a build up of unburnt LPG in the cylinder. Guess what happens when the TC is deactivated after the car thinks it has regained traction and starts firing the cylinder again ..................BOOM.

Current SVI LPG systems overcame this issue...........or so I was led to believe ???
Whitey-AMG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-08-2008, 11:46 PM   #8
FlipXW
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ESP
Well my understanding is that the LPG by passes the Injectors in a standard VAPOUR LPG system.....( as opposed to a SVI LPG system )

TC / DSC works by cutting fuel to the engine via injector / spark cut out when it senses slip / traction loss etc. By cutting engine power , the TC / DSC can work to regain the cars balance / traction loss issues.

The issue with LPG systems that bypass the injectors, is that with TC activated, the car doesn't realise that the LPG is still flowing into the cylinder ( bypassing the injectors ). In doing so, you get a build up of unburnt LPG in the cylinder. Guess what happens when the TC is deactivated after the car thinks it has regained traction and starts firing the cylinder again ..................BOOM.

Current SVI LPG systems overcame this issue...........or so I was led to believe ???
Pretty correct through my understanding.
FlipXW is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-08-2008, 11:51 PM   #9
Shounak
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ESP
Well my understanding is that the LPG by passes the Injectors in a standard VAPOUR LPG system.....( as opposed to a SVI LPG system )

TC / DSC works by cutting fuel to the engine via injector / spark cut out when it senses slip / traction loss etc. By cutting engine power , the TC / DSC can work to regain the cars balance / traction loss issues.

The issue with LPG systems that bypass the injectors, is that with TC activated, the car doesn't realise that the LPG is still flowing into the cylinder ( bypassing the injectors ). In doing so, you get a build up of unburnt LPG in the cylinder. Guess what happens when the TC is deactivated after the car thinks it has regained traction and starts firing the cylinder again ..................BOOM.

Current SVI LPG systems overcame this issue...........or so I was led to believe ???
My GAS Injected XR8 has traction control that very much works on gas.

Shutting off the injectors on a T/B injected system wouldn't do a great deal.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 12:15 AM   #10
PoweredByCNG
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
PoweredByCNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shounak
My GAS Injected XR8 has traction control that very much works on gas.

Shutting off the injectors on a T/B injected system wouldn't do a great deal.
There are no injectors on the throttle body setup on the E-gas Falcons.

Regards,
Dave
__________________
PoweredByCNG: Sick and tired of all the ignorant 'gas is crap' comments out there.
PoweredByCNG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 12:21 AM   #11
Shounak
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PoweredByCNG
There are no injectors on the throttle body setup on the E-gas Falcons.

Regards,
Dave
Referring to why the TC doesn't work on dual fuel set ups. But yeah.

What exactly did they strengthen on the e-gas motors? Was it simply the valve and valve seats?
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 12:51 AM   #12
PoweredByCNG
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
PoweredByCNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shounak
Referring to why the TC doesn't work on dual fuel set ups. But yeah.
You can't cut the fuel supply to individual cylinders with any single point system, be it carburetted petrol or mixer-based LPG. T/C relies on multipoint fuel injection as well as ignition control. Cutting the spark to one cylinder can be dangerous, especially on LPG.

Quote:
What exactly did they strengthen on the e-gas motors? Was it simply the valve and valve seats?
Connecting rods too. I can't see why Ford would need to installed hardened valve seats, 'coz the valve seats on the petrol Falcons are indestructible anyway!

Regards,
Dave
__________________
PoweredByCNG: Sick and tired of all the ignorant 'gas is crap' comments out there.
PoweredByCNG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 01:34 AM   #13
madmelon
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
Going by the current emissions laws it would have to be Euro 4 emissions compliant, and I can't see Ford going to the effort of emissions compliance for such a short amount of time.

All development on the I6 was cancelled last year.

The only thing I can think of is if somehow they have modified the DSC/TC to work with the current system.
I've been under the impression that it's much easier to meet emissions with LPG than petrol...but that may only be after it's warmed up.
madmelon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 03:52 AM   #14
Airmon
King of the Fairy's.
 
Airmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CeeeeeTown.
Posts: 5,093
Default

Should be optional, I miss having the ability to do backfires
__________________
www.bseries.com.au/airmon
They say less talk more action,
I say more torque less traction!
Airmon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 11:19 AM   #15
phillyc
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phillyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always factual and beneficial. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by madmelon
Just read this news on carpoint. I've seen it mentioned a few times that you can't have TC/DSC and gas coz it'd backfire. Am I the only person who thinks this implies that there's a new gas system coming out for the Falcon next year?

http://carpoint.com.au/car-review/2970254.aspx
I posted the same thing the other day, thought it was in the 5 stars / Go Auto reference, couldn't find it.

Anyway, great to see someone else pick up on it! ie if it DSC then it gets a Direct Injection gas system!

Here's hoping the system is liquid injection!
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s
226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013
14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013

Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell.

Retrotech thread
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6
phillyc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 05:06 PM   #16
madmelon
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phillyc
I posted the same thing the other day, thought it was in the 5 stars / Go Auto reference, couldn't find it.

Anyway, great to see someone else pick up on it! ie if it DSC then it gets a Direct Injection gas system!

Here's hoping the system is liquid injection!
Sorry man, didn't mean to make a repost- just didn't see it in a thread title when I had a quick browse.
madmelon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 05:29 PM   #17
phillyc
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phillyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always factual and beneficial. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by madmelon
Sorry man, didn't mean to make a repost- just didn't see it in a thread title when I had a quick browse.
Don't be sorry at all! I didn't mean to cut your grass. I'm happy that it has it's own thread anyway. I couldn't find my post.

My point was that I couldn't believe that most people including Go-Auto, who are without doubt the most comprehensive industry writers didn't pick up what you and I did from the DSC statement! ie DSC means that the LPG system will be updated.

The more I think about this, the more likely that Liquid Injection will be on the agenda.

The reasoning is that Ford had an agreement with a Melbourne company to use their SVI LPG system, but Dutch firm Vaille and their local distributor, Boral?, got into a legal fight over who owned what technology. Unfortunately, this dragged out from 2005, meaning that Ford was left with the ring-mixer unit, and those two fighting groups got nothing which is what they deserved for stuffing Ford up plenty.

From what I hear, those two still haven't sorted the issues, so Ford will go the newer system and steal a march on Holden and Toyota who both use Denso SVI.
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s
226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013
14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013

Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell.

Retrotech thread
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6
phillyc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 09:06 PM   #18
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by madmelon
I've been under the impression that it's much easier to meet emissions with LPG than petrol...but that may only be after it's warmed up.
Because LPG uses a lot more fuel than a petrol engine the emissions that are emitted are only around less than 10% lower than an equivalent petrol engine, so the difference isn't that great at all. From memory only 6-7%.

There can be no way they have a new LPG system, I think having a DSC/TC system that uses nothing but the brakes and fore goes a spark cut may be the solution, or maybe they have come up with some way to cut the gas flow while the DSC/TC system is activated. All I6 development work finished last year, so there is no chance of a different LPG system for the I6.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 11:14 PM   #19
madmelon
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,334
Default

Well whatever happens, I just hope they have something good for when V6 comes.
madmelon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-08-2008, 11:32 PM   #20
PoweredByCNG
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
PoweredByCNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phillyc
...Holden and Toyota who both use Denso SVI.
Dunno where you got that from???

Holden use IMPCO-BRC Sequent 56 systems for the Commodore and Toyota uses Landi Renzo systems for the Camry and Aurion.

Regards,
Dave
__________________
PoweredByCNG: Sick and tired of all the ignorant 'gas is crap' comments out there.
PoweredByCNG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2008, 04:37 PM   #21
Swordsman88
Getting it done.....
 
Swordsman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phillyc
Don't be sorry at all! I didn't mean to cut your grass. I'm happy that it has it's own thread anyway. I couldn't find my post.

My point was that I couldn't believe that most people including Go-Auto, who are without doubt the most comprehensive industry writers didn't pick up what you and I did from the DSC statement! ie DSC means that the LPG system will be updated.

The more I think about this, the more likely that Liquid Injection will be on the agenda.

The reasoning is that Ford had an agreement with a Melbourne company to use their SVI LPG system, but Dutch firm Vaille and their local distributor, Boral?, got into a legal fight over who owned what technology. Unfortunately, this dragged out from 2005, meaning that Ford was left with the ring-mixer unit, and those two fighting groups got nothing which is what they deserved for stuffing Ford up plenty.

From what I hear, those two still haven't sorted the issues, so Ford will go the newer system and steal a march on Holden and Toyota who both use Denso SVI.
I noticed this comment from goauto and thought either Ford had Bosch develop an ESP system that is quite basic (like the early systems in mercs from the 90s) and just uses abs brakes to control the slide etc or they had upgraded the LPG engine. I'm pretty sure that at FG launch the engineers said they were not upgrading the LPG engine because it would be going in 2 years (the V6 would be SVI so...).

Do you have any inside knowledge on this LPG issue phillyc??? If Ford goes to the latest system, isn't that pointless if they are retiring the engine in 18months of the upgrade happening?? If they were to 'stockpile' the I6 LPG engines they couldn't use them after June30 2010.....because of emissions regs. Unless the LPG engine would meet these standards???? Assuming some delay between the V6 coming on board and the LPG version being available (would be a big job introducing and entire new engine line up, turbos included) Ford might want to keep some I6s going.... This could work for them...interesting...
Swordsman88 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2008, 08:06 PM   #22
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

After reading the GoAuto article with the comments from Bill Osbourne, he said that E Gas will get a version of DSC. Somehow they have made them compatable, there will be no upgraded injected LPG system.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-08-2008, 03:26 PM   #23
new2ford
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
new2ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven
Posts: 3,161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
After reading the GoAuto article with the comments from Bill Osbourne, he said that E Gas will get a version of DSC. Somehow they have made them compatable, there will be no upgraded injected LPG system.
Well that will be good. This is the feature that cost the E Gas version the 5 star ANCAP rating cf the other models.

What's the pollution issues with e gas engines? What pollutants compared to a petrol engine?
new2ford is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL