VFACTS - July 2024

[Sprintey]

Originally Posted by Franco Cozzo

With what happened on the markets today with the pacific peso (AUD) taking a shit, I don't think we'll be buying anything with our shitcoin at this rate, a lovely $100B hit to the ASX - ouchies if you're on the cusp of retiring with the hit you're going to cop on your super.

Oh well, maybe we'll attract foreign investment and become a manufacturing powerhouse again if our peso falls further

Ironically part of the reason was the mad lads at the Bank of Japan actually increasing their interest rates from a floor near zero. Like throwing a boulder into a pond.

[Adamz Ghia]

Originally Posted by uranium_death

Ford have all their eggs in the one basket.
They were The Falcon Company. They're now almost 100% dependent on the Ranger-Everest Platform.
One bad build year could see the entire thing come tumbling down
Toyota have strong performers in almost very segment. The RAV-4 sells like hotcakes.

The Ford Escape has essentially died without a whimper in Australia despite being a very decent car that unlike many of the mid-sized SUVs, is an enjoyable drive. Also one of few cars in its segment that has a torque-converter in it, as opposed to a bloody CVT. Of course, nobody knows that because Ford's marketing department have still not improved one bit over the past 15 years.

I think the Everest is a decent car, but too big for me. I have no need for a Ranger. Too impractical anyway.

Ford has neglected too many market segments. The mid-range SUV is fertile ground, but you aren't going to pull people away from a Rav-4 or CX-5 if you don't give them an active reason to do so. The driving dynamics, the drivetrain, the styling etc. should all have been hammered home.
The RAV-4 styling is fine (IMO), but the drivetrain is inferior, and the handling is reportedly quite mundane. Despite that, people run towards them like Homer and the ice-cream truck.

I wish Ford supported their models more. The Focus also deserved better. The final models had fixed the DSG issues and replaced with a traditional box, but I guarantee that 99% of people wouldn't know.

For Ford's sake, I just hope the Ranger and Everest are always decent relative to their opposition, or they're going to be caught with their pants down again, or completely ripped off as in the case of Holden.

I think the styling was part of the problem. Puma looks good in the higher spec trims, but even then from some angles it looks odd, almost like a bug. Escape looks very feminine, shame we’re not getting the updated model that looks a bit more butch. Focus was the same, a good looking car in higher spec trim that still looked odd from some angles.

The interiors weren’t exactly best in class either. Functional maybe, but just seemed they built it to a price.

[kevino]

All subjective
I think all 3 look good
But powershift drama s in prev models prob damaged focus
And Puma and Escape don’t think Ford Ute Aus could get any stock from Ford Eur so they didn’t bother marketing or advertising … good cars gone bye bye

[DFB FGXR6]

Originally Posted by Adamz Ghia

I think the styling was part of the problem. Puma looks good in the higher spec trims, but even then from some angles it looks odd, almost like a bug. Escape looks very feminine, shame we’re not getting the updated model that looks a bit more butch. Focus was the same, a good looking car in higher spec trim that still looked odd from some angles.

The interiors weren’t exactly best in class either. Functional maybe, but just seemed they built it to a price.

Ford deliberately softened the Escape's styling for the current generation, namely, to put distance between it and the Bronco Sport which shares the same platform. Problem is that concept was only relevant for US customers because Ford stupidly limited the Bronco Sport to the US market, so every other market got a take it or leave it proposition.

[kypez]

Originally Posted by uranium_death

For Ford's sake, I just hope the Ranger and Everest are always decent relative to their opposition, or they're going to be caught with their pants down again, or completely ripped off as in the case of Holden.

The real test will be the new Prado. The less conservative styling might do well in that segment. Will be interesting to see Everest numbers against that.

[FTE217]

Prado has never been a looker so it won’t matter, it’s their distribution and return business and fleet.
Ford hardly over turns them but for Ranger getting ahead of them in advancements originally.
There has hardly been a Toy flop of the popular volume models even with recalls dpf dogs they keep re climbing the step ladder.
Always a challenge but they recover ground lost or near enough.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jpd80]

Originally Posted by DFB FGXR6

Ford deliberately softened the Escape's styling for the current generation, namely, to put distance between it and the Bronco Sport which shares the same platform. Problem is that concept was only relevant for US customers because Ford stupidly limited the Bronco Sport to the US market, so every other market got a take it or leave it proposition.

You could also make an argument that the softening of Escape body was to migrate
more Focus buyers to a more profitable vehicle.

It matters little as Ford Europe has cut a lot of the Euro 5 versions and Australia can’t
import Euro 6 compliant vehicles until the fuel available here in about 18 months.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m in the camp that would love to see more compact fords here,
America/Mexico exports to us would be helpful if the vehicles were designed in RHD…
What a cluster, a RHD Maverick and Bronco Sport would be interesting models to sell here
but absolutely not on the radar unless big changes happen.

It’s clear that Ford has a set its plan on highly profitable Ranger /Everest sales, that success
at least gives Ford a chance to at least look at a business plan for more vehicles but then,
governments pushing like crazy with electrification sure doesn’t help.