Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-04-2009, 10:42 PM   #61
imugli
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by z80
It's been proven in the last 30 years that the trend is towards fuel efficient cars.

Yes there are blips in the last10 years of cheap petrol, but the price always eventually rises.....and GM and ford have ignored the warning signs.

Commodores/Pontiacs are not efficient on fuel....quite the opposite.

Even when GMH made a 4 cylinder Commodore in the 1980's it used as much fuel as a 6 cyl.

GMH have read the market wrong, apart from a few forum enthusiasts and company fleet buyers...Commodores are thirsty chariots compared to the Jap and european offerings.

Goodbye and good riddance I say.....

15 litres per 100 kilometres is obscene fuel consumption in 2009.
I couldn't agree more. But if 3000 yanks want to buy these things and keep a few aussies in jobs, sell them as flipping Daewoo's for all I care. Not to mention the fact that I think we've all moved on a little from the Opel 4cyl (Recalls fond (not) memories of my sister's PLUS4 Torana - MASSIVE AGGRESSIVE Flared body kit, Itty Bitty little 4cyl engine)

Right now, the only reason Holden aren't sacking half their staff is because they can't afford to pay redundancies and whilst I have no heartfelt attachment to Holden whatsoever, I still want those blokes to be able to pay their mortgages and put bread and water on their tables... Alas, it all looks too late...
imugli is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2009, 01:12 AM   #62
GK
Walking with God
 
GK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,321
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
Just because an engine complies with a standard somewhere else does not mean it complies here and even if it does it still must be engineered into the vehicle at enormous expense.
Euro 4 or 5 is the same the world over isn't it?

GK
__________________
2009 Mondeo Zetec TDCi - Moondust Silver

2015 Kia Sorento Platinum - Snow White Pearl

2001 Ducati Monster 900Sie - Red

Now gone!
1999 AU1 Futura Wagon - Sparkling Burgundy
On LPG



Want a Full Life? John 10:10
GK is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2009, 01:16 AM   #63
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GK
Euro 4 or 5 is the same the world over isn't it?

GK
Yeah. Were a little behind Europe and the states. It's more the poorer countries that dont have emission control.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2009, 02:09 AM   #64
MethodX
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MethodX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmo20btt
Dont know about l/cruiser but i do know that all early crown/ cressida had mercedes benz emblems still on the block, so the castings were straight from MB.
Ford were offered the VW factory for free after ww2. But henry Ford 2 turned it down calling the car a little box.

Not one of his better decisions.
MethodX is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2009, 12:31 PM   #65
R-Design
Guess Who's Back?
 
R-Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,369
Default

I'm not sure if this is more GMH positive spin, but it sounds like the G8 might rise from the ashes afterall. If so it's another missed opportunity for Ford AU & US.

http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mell...2575A6001F0097
R-Design is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2009, 03:08 PM   #66
cosmo20btt
Fordaholic
 
cosmo20btt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss315
I'm not sure if this is more GMH positive spin, but it sounds like the G8 might rise from the ashes afterall. If so it's another missed opportunity for Ford AU & US.

http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mell...2575A6001F0097
isn't it obvious to Ford US that the Falcon is is the only car in its stable that is
capable of competing against the US Commode if it was to become available to the US police force?
cosmo20btt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2009, 04:04 PM   #67
imugli
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 531
Default

I'm sure it is but remember that GM already have the support structure in place for the VE. The engine is a straight bolt in crate engine, the gearboxes are parts bin boxes, the platform is used (produced) for the Camaro.

The Falcon can't do LHD at the moment (Steering arm doesn't fit, from memory), it uses a German 6 speed that no other Ford does and an orphan engine. Supporting it would be a nightmare and cost a bomb to implement.

Here's an out there idea...

We now know that GM own all the IP for the Zeta platform and produce it over there now for the Camaro. How much of a stretch would it be for them to simply, instead of importing Commodore from Oz, produce a run (even in CKD form) in a Camaro plant? Is it absolutely out of the question that GM start producing the Commodore over there (where volume supports costs) and Oz ends up a CKD plant for it alongside CRuze derivatives? Given that they're talking about utes as well, I personally don't think so...
imugli is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2009, 06:10 PM   #68
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

[QUOTE=imugli]
The Falcon can't do LHD at the moment (Steering arm doesn't fit, from memory), it uses a German 6 speed that no other Ford does and an orphan engine. Supporting it would be a nightmare and cost a bomb to implement.
QUOTE]

the FG is LHD friendly, it was designed with LHD in mind. Ford Us just didn't see it fit in the marketpace in these unstable times.
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2009, 08:07 PM   #69
imugli
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 531
Default

[QUOTE=Nikked]
Quote:
Originally Posted by imugli
The Falcon can't do LHD at the moment (Steering arm doesn't fit, from memory), it uses a German 6 speed that no other Ford does and an orphan engine. Supporting it would be a nightmare and cost a bomb to implement.
QUOTE]

the FG is LHD friendly, it was designed with LHD in mind. Ford Us just didn't see it fit in the marketpace in these unstable times.
I believe the steering arm fouls something on the 4l engine, deeming it unsuitable. It's been mentioned here a couple of times...
imugli is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2009, 08:37 PM   #70
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default

The FG Falcon is design protected for LHD, meaning that there is nothing in the current structure or configuration that will prohibit the implementation of LHD if the green light was given to develop it.
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2009, 08:26 PM   #71
z80
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csv8
US loss to cost Holden $1bn a year
Article from: The Sunday Mail (Qld)



Carly Crawford

April 26, 2009 12:00am

EMBATTLED carmaker Holden stands to lose up to $1 billion a year when its ailing United States parent dumps major brand Pontiac.

General Motors is this week expected to announce plans to ditch or sell the brand as it desperately works to stave off bankruptcy.

That means the maker of Australia's most popular car could be in for more pain.

Holden had been banking on exporting 30,000 VE Commodores each year to the US, where the model is sold as the high-performance Pontiac G8.

VE Commodore exports began last year in a deal worth about $1 billion a year.

Holden builds the left-hand drive VE Commodore – with help from a $6.7 million Federal Government loan – at its plant in Elizabeth, South Australia.

The company spent $77 million preparing the plant for the vehicle's production, hailing the project as the future of the Elizabeth plant.

The deal was expected to lift Holden exports to 70,000 a year – half its total production.

Although the car was well-received by US auto critics, the world economic crisis meant the G8, which retails for $A53,000 in North America, has failed to achieve strong sales.

Only about half the 25,000 G8s delivered to the US have been sold.

Holden, which has not made a profit since 2004, had hoped VE Commodore exports would reach up to 50,000 a year.

It is Holden's second blow this year over Pontiac's demise.

In January, Pontiac shelved plans to import a G8 ute from Australia as its performance sports truck.

Not looking good for Holden, bright side, more FORDS will be sold downunder !!!


I've just re-read the first post in this thread.

Congratulations Holden..it's the same as Mitsubishi all over again...the same story, almost word for word..

(a) A car with a big engine
(b) relying on exports to the US to justify investment
(c) Government "grants" due to projected export earnings
(d) a high aussie dollar making the product over $50k in the US
(e) the plant is in Adelaide...LOL



Oh well....looks like disasters come in two's...or is it threes??
z80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2009, 09:15 PM   #72
Gobes32
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Gobes32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,021
Default

The worst part for all involved is the uncertainty. GM know they are in major poo, the whole world knows they are as well....... Why do they not come out and say "This is where we are at, this is what we will do and these are the brands that are disappearing"

Not long now till deadline and Holden do not know where they stand in the big scheme of things. It's a joke.
Gobes32 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2009, 09:18 PM   #73
Daymoe
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,082
Default

The deadline is June 1st right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by EviLkarL
How about you start your trip at the Christmas Island Refugee and detention centre. After a short 6 year stay you can turn around and go back to where you came from. lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourbastard
ive got the weight gain bit mastered, Colonel Sanders is my personal trainer.

As to weight loss, nah, im a fat bastard and proud of it, im going to die from a massive heart attack, for theres nothing worse then lying around in hospital dying from nothing.
Daymoe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-05-2009, 06:48 AM   #74
robjh80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
robjh80's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daymoe
The deadline is June 1st right?
Yep, sure is.

One month to change this mess around ... good luck with that GM!
robjh80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-05-2009, 06:34 PM   #75
Falc'man
You dig, we stick!
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
Default

Filing for bankruptcy may sound bad but I think it's what GM want; a new start without being bound to the UAW?
__________________
"....You don't put the car through engineering" - Rod Barrett.
Falc'man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-05-2009, 08:16 PM   #76
R-Design
Guess Who's Back?
 
R-Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,369
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falc'man
Filing for bankruptcy may sound bad but I think it's what GM want; a new start without being bound to the UAW?
You mean, apart from being owned by them & the US Gov't.
R-Design is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-05-2009, 08:17 PM   #77
TERMINATOR X
3000 CCA STARTER MOTOR
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eu-GenixX
i think you'd find most holden customers would probably switch to toyota
Not if they want 300 kw+ RWD beasts they wouldn't.
Or just a nice looking car.
Or just a turbo.
Or just a V8.
Or just a GT.
Or just a typhoon.
Or just a nice burble.
Or just a quick car.
Or just an aussie car.

:evil3:
TERMINATOR X is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-05-2009, 08:18 PM   #78
TERMINATOR X
3000 CCA STARTER MOTOR
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 165
Default

Toyota can lick my sack.
TERMINATOR X is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-05-2009, 08:50 PM   #79
Watto_Cobra
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Watto_Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TERMINATOR X
Toyota can lick my sack.
^^^ : You read my mind.
__________________
Daily: AU1 Fairmont Ghia - 380,000 km (still going strong)
Weekender: 2009 G6ETurbo - 21,656 km - Seduce/Cashmere
(The only shopping list I need: 4 Litres and a hairdryer)
Daily: SZII - 56,000 km - converted to Tezza
Watto_Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL