|
03-01-2005, 12:55 AM | #1 | ||
hibernating
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,135
|
Just wondering if anyone knows if a wagon is much slower than a sedan performance wise? i.e. 0-100 and quarter mile times? I think they only weigh around 50kgs more than a sedan. I'm talking mainly about ea-ed wagons but interested about any models really.
Ben. |
||
03-01-2005, 07:56 AM | #2 | ||
RIP...
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
|
They are quite a bit slower, mainly because they are more than 100kg heavier.
Rick.
__________________
. Oval Everywhere... |
||
03-01-2005, 08:26 AM | #3 | ||
E-Series Owners Club
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sth. East. Suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 781
|
Isn't the old rule that 50kg equals about 0.1s down the quarter?
so based on that they should be about 0.2s slower... I'm not sure why, though, but something tells me they would be slower than that. :P Cheers, Dave |
||
03-01-2005, 09:04 AM | #4 | ||
Donating Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,064
|
My old man had an AU wagon I6 on factory dual fuel. The thing used to haul ***! I've driven AU sedans that felt nowhere near as quick. Perhaps it was just a freak!?!?
|
||
03-01-2005, 09:17 AM | #5 | |||
Bad Music and Litre Bikes
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Westmeadows
Posts: 2,446
|
The AU I6 is a pretty powerful engine IMO. I've done a MotorKhana in one, it was a wagon, and i had a great time.
Its a shame that Motor mag etc dont do comparisons between sedan v's wagon. The best way i could see to do it is if you had a stock wagon and a stock sedan and ran them down the 1/4 a few times. Then average out the times... The wagon would have to be slower, because of the extra weight.
__________________
XY Wagon - NAKED! Quote:
|
|||
03-01-2005, 10:50 AM | #6 | ||
Member of 12sec club
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 53
|
i own a v8 eb ghia wagon it run a 16.1 sec 1/4 and i have gone up against NZ V8 EB ghia sedan an it runs about a 15.95 sec 1/4 this was when he still had the auto these cars are identical right down to the color ecept one is a wagon and one is a sedan. So the extra weight cost me about 0.15 seconds
__________________
A.P.S stage11 12.647@112.28mph 60ft 1.914 258rwkws |
||
03-01-2005, 01:21 PM | #7 | ||
hibernating
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,135
|
well my eb wagon manual, wade 1004 112 cam, pacemaker extractors, 2.5inch exhaust, bmc filter... i've dragged my brother in his stock eb sedan auto. i beat him off the line easy enough but once we get to around 120kmph his car catches me. so i'm thinking something is seriously wrong with my car. i've done a few runs using a g-tech and i get around 8.5seconds 0-100 and 16.3 quarter mile.
|
||
03-01-2005, 01:31 PM | #8 | ||
hmm eyebrows
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley, NSW
Posts: 2,393
|
My wagon isn't too shabby. I'd gladly take on a similar spec sedan and see how it would go, especially now that it has the 5 speed and the 3.27 gears. Anyone have a gtech in the Bathurst/Orange area?
__________________
XE 4.9 Falcon S & XA 4.9 Fairmont hardtop |
||
03-01-2005, 05:31 PM | #9 | ||
hibernating
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,135
|
well i played around a bit with the timing today and managed 0-100 in about 8.2seconds and a quarter mile of one 16.1second run and two 16.2second runs... i think if i had grip on the rear tyre i might be able to just get a high 15 maybe...
|
||
03-01-2005, 05:33 PM | #10 | |||
Member of 12sec club
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
__________________
A.P.S stage11 12.647@112.28mph 60ft 1.914 258rwkws |
|||
03-01-2005, 05:35 PM | #11 | |||
Member of 12sec club
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
__________________
A.P.S stage11 12.647@112.28mph 60ft 1.914 258rwkws |
|||
03-01-2005, 05:37 PM | #12 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,165
|
Ive never done the quater in my wagon ..... well never done the quater in anything yet :P ... but I know the handling will be different ... long wheel base v shorter sedan wheel base .......
My personal belief, apart from the few kilos extra, Is, it is all in the drivers ability ..... |
||
03-01-2005, 06:00 PM | #13 | ||
hibernating
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,135
|
it is a 6cyl. and i'm pretty certain its a little bit quicker manual then it was auto.
|
||
03-01-2005, 06:05 PM | #14 | ||
"WHEEZER" POWERED
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Western Suburbs, Victoria
Posts: 1,385
|
Id love to have a fangin wagon !! It would be the best sleeper going round !!
|
||
03-01-2005, 06:08 PM | #15 | ||
Former E-Series Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,733
|
With manual there is a much greater emphasis on the driver than with auto. I've noticed auto cars give much more consistent quarter mile performance from one run to the next, whereas with manual, the launch and shifting is critical.
|
||
03-01-2005, 06:12 PM | #16 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
|
I'm quite sure drag would play a part in performance. The wagons' rear isn't streamline-friendly, so it'll chew up more kw to cruise at say 100km
ie, an EB sedan might require 10kw of power to keep it cruising at 100kph (no winds), while the wagon variant might require 12kw due to its more abruptly-finishing ****-end. :p -Dave- |
||
03-01-2005, 06:22 PM | #17 | ||
hibernating
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,135
|
i agree you dont get as consistent times with the manual.. plus my diff is only a single spinner 3.27 ratio.. and i have a bald tyre so i cant launch it hard at the moment.
i guess the wagon would drag a bit more and more weight.. would slow it down a bit. p.s. nice avatar ghia5l |
||
03-01-2005, 06:50 PM | #18 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
|
hehe yes they're friendly girls alright :p
|
||