Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2010, 02:34 PM   #1
mcnews
Trev
 
mcnews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Was Perth, now country Vic
Posts: 8,017
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Trev has owned several boosted fords and has really contributed a lot of info on them. His posts in the bike section are also very helpful. I think he should be recognised as a technical contributor. 
Default Disappointing Safety Ratings For Cab Chassis Utes

DISAPPOINTING SAFETY RATINGS FOR CAB CHASSIS UTES

Australia’s leading independent vehicle safety advocate, the Australasian New Car Assessment Program, today announced 3-star safety ratings for two cab chassis utes – the Toyota Landcruiser 70 Series and the Nissan Patrol – following crash tests of the vehicles.

ANCAP Manager, Nicholas Clarke, said the 3-star rating for the two utes, which are popular in rural areas, was not a good result – they both provided very disappointing protection for occupants and poor protection for pedestrians struck by the front of the vehicle.

Mr Clarke said the vehicles offered minimal safety features and the passenger compartment lost structural integrity in both crash tests.

“Neither of these vehicles provided adequate occupant protection in our test – there was particularly severe deformation of the floor and footwell areas,” he said.

“While understanding these utes are built on a separate chassis and are more of a work-horse than a passenger vehicle, the results do not bode well for the driver and any occupants in the event of a severe crash. These vehicles are often driven on rural roads, where crashes as severe as the ANCAP offset crash test are not unusual – the occupants deserve better protection.

“In the centre front seating position, both vehicles have a lap-only seat belt and no air bag – the occupant is at a greatly increased risk of severe injury compared with those protected by a lap/sash seat belt and an air bag.

“Research shows that, for every star you take off, the risk of serious and life-threatening injury increases. Owners and drivers of commercial vehicles need to consider safety in the event of a crash. ANCAP has concerns about the safety ratings for these two utes.”

ANCAP recommends at least 4 stars and preferably 5 stars for commercial vehicles. There are already several 4 and 5 star commercial vehicles on the market. ANCAP is supported by all Australian and New Zealand motoring clubs, the Australian Government, the New Zealand government, all Australian state governments, the Victorian Transport Accident Commission, NRMA Insurance and the FIA Foundation.

__________________
Trev
(FPV FG II GT-E thus the fully loaded burger with the lot as standard +Alpine/Dynamat fitout - 2 of only 4 ever made GT-E factory 9" rear rims - Michelin Pilot Supersports - Shockworks Suspension)
mcnews is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-12-2010, 02:58 PM   #2
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

i wonder how they fare with a bull bar fitted?
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-12-2010, 04:01 PM   #3
ZA-289
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ZA-289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,343
Default

The patrol Design dates back to 1988.

The land cruiser design dates back to 1985.

Safety standards were not the same back then.
ZA-289 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 03-12-2010, 04:05 PM   #4
TheInterceptor
Cruising...
 
TheInterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnews
..... they both provided very disappointing protection for occupants and poor protection for pedestrians struck by the front of the vehicle.
Sorry but no pedestrian is going to fare well against a cruisertrol....

Id still rather be in one of these than a Great Wall (or similar).
__________________
FBT '98
BA XT '04
F100 4x4 '82

Subaru Outback '02
TheInterceptor is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL