Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Ford Australia Vehicles > Small and Mid Sized Cars > Fiesta, Festiva and Ka

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2006, 02:00 PM   #1
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default pod filter VS panel filter replacement in Stock Airbox

hey all just wondering what the power difference is between a pod filter and a pannel filter.also if there is another thread out there that will answer my Q THEN GIMMIE plz lol. heheheh htnaks all.

__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"

photn is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-07-2006, 02:46 PM   #2
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Pretty much no power difference at all. They're just air filters... they filter air.

For power, get a whole new intake.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-07-2006, 12:37 AM   #3
amlohac
Regular Member
 
amlohac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 333
Default

turbo.... not pod....

worried about the $$$ a turbo costs? start saving...

Steffo = very right.
amlohac is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2006, 08:46 PM   #4
JD2004
Regular Member
 
JD2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 308
Default

Im looking at getting the K&N Pannel filter for mine.. i hope it works well..

JD2004 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-02-2007, 03:51 AM   #5
FlappyMacNaps
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 25
Default

If I could ad to this ancient thread, I bought a second hand panel for my EL 6 cyl, with approx fifty thousand k's on it, It made a noticeable difference. The throttle was more responsive, I found that I could cruise at speed limits at lower rpm than before.

The BIG difference was when I cleaned a 9 year old throttle body for the first time. it was like the panel filter difference x 2.

Car Idles smoother, accelerates smoother + faster, better fuel economy, engine is smoother throughout rev range, Cruise speed = quieter engine.

The problem I face now is the "capped" feeling of the exhaust, under 3k rpm you will notice the difference i think anyone who says otherwise has a dead engine. I didnt think filters made such a diff, but I Also think the filter that was in there before this was about 6 years old, i dunno if anyone had ever changed it, my dad thinks things just work forever and never get dirty. The car is in better hands now.. it is a 1997 EL with 197k odo. Cheers. Next is fat 3.5 inch polished custom alloy intake remove all restriction there, and then pacemakers etc. wish me luck.
FlappyMacNaps is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-02-2007, 10:53 AM   #6
Ives
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ives's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 2,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steffo
Pretty much no power difference at all. They're just air filters... they filter air.
I shall find out on Saturday.
Ives is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-02-2007, 11:08 AM   #7
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default

theoretically if the Air Filter allows more air to pass shouldnt it increase performance as there isnt that LAG time to get the air into the engine? im not talking about a MAJOR performance. but just a slight one!
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"

photn is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-02-2007, 12:18 PM   #8
Piotr
Non-Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,040
Default

You get increased performance mainly by reducing restriction (ignoring resonance tuning). A stock air filter on a stock engine has almost no restriction through it so replacing it with a panel filter won't give you a measurable increase. They have the potential to flow more air than the stock filter so once you do some other mods you can start to see improvements. The major advantage of them is they possible flow more when dirty and they last longer
Piotr is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 06:11 PM   #9
Ives
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ives's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 2,368
Default

So I bought Piotr's BMC Panel Filter today. I had a drive right after I installed it and the car went NOTICEABLY quicker (to the owner of the blue Corolla Sportivo I saw today... if you're reading this... im sorry you got owned by a chick's car while your gf is watching :hihi: ).

Curious, I went to Castle Hill Exhaust and run it on a dyno. I was VERY surprised to see an average of 79.2kW at the wheels. Did 3 runs... 79.2kW, 80.1kW, 78.5kW. Once I find the driver for my scanner, I'll post the sheets/graph etc etc.

Not too bad... not too bad at all.



Other infos regarding my car :-

-2" Cat-back sports exhaust (installed by Castle Hill Exhaust)
-BP Ultimate fuel
-Castrol EDGE 5W-30 engine oil
-12,500kms on the odometer.

Last edited by HyperKid; 17-02-2007 at 06:23 PM.
Ives is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 06:54 PM   #10
photn
AFF Post NAZI
 
photn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
Default

interesting... any one have anything to say about this?
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully"


Last edited by photn; 17-02-2007 at 07:08 PM.
photn is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 02:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL