|
|
06-07-2022, 08:48 AM | #1 | ||
Regular...with metamusal
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Geeeloong
Posts: 6,969
|
Hi all.
would i be correct in stating that the AU series [from series 1] went back to the coil pack from the coil/dizzy of the previous EL?. i'm pretty sure they did, however i want to be sure i don't put my big foot in me mouth Thanks |
||
07-07-2022, 08:51 PM | #2 | |||
Regular...with metamusal
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Geeeloong
Posts: 6,969
|
Quote:
welll . . . . ...... i'm going with the yes comments then |
|||
07-07-2022, 09:04 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hervey Bay
Posts: 5,396
|
I with the rest of the crowd.
Yes they did go back to coil packs. What I didn't know and have just learned is the AU1 shared the coilpack with the EF. Later AU2/3 used a different coilpack. https://www.tiperformance.com.au/pro...ignition-coil/ Different plugs and greater coil output. |
||
This user likes this post: |
07-07-2022, 09:22 PM | #4 | ||||||||
Regular...with metamusal
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Geeeloong
Posts: 6,969
|
Quote:
that's what i thought and so i answered back with.... Quote:
on fordmods - just noticed the advertising link |
||||||||
07-07-2022, 09:22 PM | #5 | ||
DIY Tragic
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sydney, more than not. I hate it.
Posts: 23,302
|
One coil pack had male terminals, others had female terminals. That’s the distinction I remember. Foster Ute (AU2) had females as built.
|
||
This user likes this post: |
07-07-2022, 10:48 PM | #6 | ||
Regular...with metamusal
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Geeeloong
Posts: 6,969
|
|
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|