|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
19-09-2011, 09:34 AM | #1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 612
|
Might sound like a silly question though I will ask it anyway as am sure somebody on here would know the answer, lets see who really is the Ford Guru on AFF
What is the weight balance on a FG I6 Falcon as in front to rear etc? I would guess they are front heavy at around 65% front 35% rear, any takers? |
||
19-09-2011, 03:02 PM | #2 | |||
No longer a Uni student..
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
|
Quote:
|
|||
19-09-2011, 03:45 PM | #4 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,138
|
55.5% front : 44.5% rear.
|
||
19-09-2011, 03:53 PM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 612
|
ZF Box, thanks guys I did not think it would be that far to the front (65/35) specially on the NA 6 however I thought me saying 65/35 might just make some more keen to tell me I was wrong & thus give me an answer lol
So assuming he is right FalconXV gets the prize which is simply a ty from me & Recognition as being a Ford guru |
||
19-09-2011, 03:56 PM | #6 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 612
|
So next question would be how much weight would you need to transfer to the rear to make it 50/50 & could that even be done?
And will the upcoming 2 Litre have a better balance? |
||
19-09-2011, 04:14 PM | #7 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 400
|
two fat blokes in the back seat?
|
||
19-09-2011, 04:17 PM | #8 | ||||
Cane Farmer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tom Price, WA
Posts: 4,056
|
Quote:
__________________
1994 ED XR6T - Cobalt Blue. 2009 FG XR6 - Black. Quote:
|
||||
20-09-2011, 07:51 AM | #9 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 776
|
Quote:
To be 50/50, 85kg would have to go from directly above the front wheels to directly above the back wheels.......or put about 2 x 85kg in the back seat, yep two fat blokes. Yep, you can move lighter things further past the axles to achieve the same effect, but that can affect the dynamics in other ways. Really though the cars are setup pretty well, if they started at 50/50 empty they'd end up horrible once you've put the driver in and with any sort of a load in the boot or rear seat. |
|||
20-09-2011, 08:55 AM | #10 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,312
|
Quote:
__________________
My ride: 2007 Falcon Ute BF XR8 Orange, MTO. |
|||
20-09-2011, 10:13 AM | #11 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
|
While generally speaking 50/50 Front to Rear weight distribution is a good thing, it’s not always the best outcome the engineers are trying to achieve. When it comes to car handling the car’s static (stationary) weight distribution is not as important as the actual weight distribution when the car is moving. For example:
When the car is braking the weight distribution will always move Forward (i.e. front biased) When the car is accelerating hard the weight distribution will always move backwards (i.e. rear biased) When the car is turning the weight distribution will move to the front and the cornering side, and then progressively balance back to the centre while moving rearwards as the car begins to accelerate out of the corner. That shift in the vehicles mass will generate additional pressure on the tyres hence increasing grip, which will help when braking, accelerating, and cornering … Many racing cars are actually setup to not be perfectly equal while stationary, however when driven at their expected speed they will achieve the required weight distribution for ultimate performance in the required circumstances |
||
20-09-2011, 11:24 AM | #12 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 776
|
Quote:
|
|||
20-09-2011, 04:59 AM | #13 | |||
No longer a Uni student..
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
|
Quote:
And most likely. |
|||
20-09-2011, 05:20 AM | #14 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,443
|
The I-6 versions are most likely 55% F 45% R but the iron block 5.4 Boss probably changed that to more like
60% F 40% R which is similar to a FWD Cars weight balance and probably why the V8s used to feel a touch nose heavy... |
||
20-09-2011, 06:08 AM | #15 | ||
No longer a Uni student..
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
|
How much does a typical lead-aid battery weigh? If you moved it to the boot...multiply that by 2 and you get the rearward weight shift.
Would have to be about a 50kg net change? |
||
20-09-2011, 07:56 PM | #16 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
|
|||
20-09-2011, 04:57 AM | #18 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 612
|
lol so where can I hire a couple of Sumo's?
|
||
20-09-2011, 10:15 AM | #19 | ||||
Cane Farmer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tom Price, WA
Posts: 4,056
|
Quote:
__________________
1994 ED XR6T - Cobalt Blue. 2009 FG XR6 - Black. Quote:
|
||||
20-09-2011, 11:55 AM | #20 | |||
love the quad cams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Baulkham Hills
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
|
|||
20-09-2011, 12:22 PM | #21 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bat Cave
Posts: 1,237
|
fat blokes are 85kg now?
WOW |
||
20-09-2011, 12:36 PM | #22 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 776
|
Quote:
Last edited by sudszy; 20-09-2011 at 12:45 PM. |
|||
20-09-2011, 12:50 PM | #23 | ||
Ich bin ein auslander
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
|
The Op asked about finding out weight distribution specs, I am thinking this has gone a little bit OT.
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional! |
||
20-09-2011, 08:05 PM | #24 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 612
|
While I can almost understand all that tech speak it does leave me a little lost though taking 1 part of it which I feel is relevent to myself & my reasons for asking is that if you have that many kilos of extra weight on the front would that not under hard braking make the extra weight more of an inluence than it would be under normal driving conditions thus making the not so bad balance as some have said rather bad?
As in a multiplier effect of sorts? Moving the battery into the boot in one of those battery boxes sounds good though would you then lose some effect of the alternator as the cables would be much longer than they were under the bonnet? |
||
20-09-2011, 09:09 PM | #25 | |||||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 776
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Doing it properly raised the level of complexity significantly, do you really want to do this for next to no gain? |
|||||
20-09-2011, 09:17 PM | #26 | |||
No longer a Uni student..
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
|
Quote:
|
|||
20-09-2011, 09:25 PM | #27 | ||
No longer a Uni student..
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
|
The worry is that if you change the weight balance you might have to completely redo your suspension if you want to take advantage of it.
And since most of the available aftermarket options would have been developed with a standard car, you'd possibly have to get something custom made? |
||
20-09-2011, 09:37 PM | #28 | ||
Pity the fool
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
|
If you relocated the battery to the boot, some voltage drop would be inevitable when power was demanded from the battery (like starting) however use say No. 6 B&S battery cable (i.e heavy gauge) and a good earth this can be minimised
And yes it would need to be vented to the outside, or alternatively use an AGM battery that is not filled with lead acid and you won't have to vent it
__________________
Fords I own or have owned: 1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin |
||
21-09-2011, 08:08 AM | #29 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 612
|
Thanks for the replies guys & girl
It sounded like a good idea when I first thought of it however now I am not so sure, maybe I will just work over the suspension & leave the weight balance alone lol I never knew the VE's battery was in the boot & I have looked over one on a test drive when they first came out, I will pop into my local Holden dealer & have a look not that I dont believe you is just I am amazed by this lol Ok thanks again guys |
||