Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-02-2010, 08:31 AM   #39
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,449
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boris
Why don't ford use the tech from inside out heads on the new power stroke diesel engines, that way a single sequential could nestle in the valley of the v. Plus surely one turbo is cheaper than two?
You have far more under bonnet room in F trucks to allow reverse cylinder heads,
they could be made to work on cars as per some European examples but I think cost and
commonality with naturaly aspirated versions still dominates cost factors...
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL