|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-05-2011, 01:06 PM
|
#26 | ||
|
No longer a Uni student..
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
|
What are we comparing them on?
Looks? Safety? Performance? Lets compare the VR/VS with the EF/EL Remember that the VR/VS commodores while lighter then the EF/EL, got that lightness at the expense of the passenger cell rigidity (from memory), the VT which got the stronger structure, was much heavier. From a performance perspective though, the decreased weight probably more then compensated for their less powerful motor. Looks? Falcon has 'maintained' its looks better over time, possibly due to not having lights on the boot that can lose alignment, however properly maintained, both cars can look awesome. Some really good example's of E-series XR's in the photo section, and i've seen some really good looking VS commodores around. |
||
|
|
Re: Which commodore/falcon models are the most evenly matched?
Threaded Mode