|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
15-08-2013, 01:27 AM
|
#1 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marion Adelaide
Posts: 184
|
Ford tell us the Falcon ecoboost is fuel efficent..
"the Falcon XT is the only model to return the 8.1L/100km economy figure, with the G6 and G6E models officially rated at 8.5L/100km." So we have a full sized car with a turbo 4, to haul the family, dog, trailer and what have you around. Why do we like the I6? - torque - So why not do the smart thing, square up the I6 and sleeve to 2.5l - anyone what to bet the fuel figures would be better than the turbo 4 ? Having driven the Generals 1.4 turbo 4 in the Cruze for 2000ks across the Eyre Hwy I can tell you 40+ degrees in the shade + little turbo do not make for a happy Aussie marriage. (5c no change required) |
||
|
|
the smarter choice ?
Threaded Mode