Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2016, 07:06 AM   #91
UTXR8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: victoria
Posts: 141
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

wouldnt touch a mustang, no matter what ...i dont find them good to look at, or good to drive...for the price?...bucket of ****...as for the 4 cylinder version?..id not even consider it for the price theyre asking...its not always about which is faster or more powerful...id never swap my fg xr8 for a turbo6 for example, yet many will say the turbo will flog the xr8...so what?...i will nevber buy a new 'large' ford car again,..least of all a poorly assembled american one
UTXR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2016, 07:10 AM   #92
MAGPIE
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MAGPIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Shakey Isles
Posts: 3,428
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by au_classic View Post
I still don't see the Mustangs being worth what they are selling them for especially a base model gt at 75k


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It ain't no base model
MAGPIE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 07:34 AM   #93
SprintFg
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 131
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Top_Ghia View Post
What's with all the 4 pot pony owners bashing anyone who dares criticize the EB Stang.
I've driven them a couple of times and the OP has nailed it. I tried all the fancy mode buttons including the mystical Track mode but it doesn't help. The harder you try and drive it the worse it feels. It lacks character and feels dull. It's needs a bit of fizz injected into it. I'm sure with a good tune and a nice exhaust it would perk up a bit.
I've driven just about every fast Ford from the last 15 years and this was probably the most disappointing. I'd rather drive an ST Fiesta or an XR6.

Don't get me wrong. The EB Stang isn't slow. It goes ok, particularly when driven at normal traffic speeds. But it doesn't feel special in any way. Spec sheets and quarter mile slips only tell part of the story with any car. The rest is in the drive.
The 5.0 looks the same but sounds and feels like a totally different car. It has some teeth behind the wolfs clothing.

So I don't like the EB Mustang either. Are you going to tell me I'm wrong or my opinion is invalid somehow? Be careful if you do as I also have opinions on some of the owners of EB Mustangs.
Absolutely. Others on here should go drive it,mother will see what we see.

It's all style and no substance the 2.3 mustang. The sheep in wolves clothing
SprintFg is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2016, 07:54 AM   #94
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,603
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Some of the post/reactions are either baiting or even more frightening an example of what i was talking about.

Live and let live, they both do skids..geez.

What nimrod compares a $65k+RRP performance sedan to a cut price coupe @ ~$45k.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
5 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 07:57 AM   #95
4stanger
Powered By EcoBoost
 
4stanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Qld.
Posts: 3,508
Talking Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

I didn't want any part of this thread as I new it was a bait from the get go.
But when some one starts claiming that the 4 pot stang is no quicker than a bog stock XR6 (obvious uniformed bait) and some started to swallow this as logic, I had to make a point about that and also advised the silent majority out there, they should form there own opinion and test drive one them selves if they are curious and not believe a minority and biased point of view.
Obviously some have got there nose out of joint with this car and express this by claiming character association with those have interest or own these vehicles , is this jealously or envy or have difficulty comprehending changes in the market?
My reasons for purchasing one are for my own personal reasons, was never purchased with the intension of a high performer or boy racer I am too old for that, but hell if I had a job, even a hair dressers job I would then be able to afford a the V8 GT version I
On paper, the 4 pot Mustangs are more comparable performance wise with the b series turbos with their weight and power figures, by feel of the seat of the pants ride it also feels the same, maybe some people have more sensitive feel in their seat of their pants than others
4stanger is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2016, 07:57 AM   #96
SprintFg
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 131
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Nothing wrong with 4 cyl turbo but in light cars, focus Rs, golf r, wrx sti etc

But in a heavy mustang muscle car ?? It's a huge cup of wrong.
SprintFg is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 08:01 AM   #97
FairmontGS
WT GT
Donating Member3
 
FairmontGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The GSS
Posts: 17,876
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by SprintFg View Post
Nothing wrong with 4 cyl turbo but in light cars, focus Rs, golf r, wrx sti etc

But in a heavy mustang muscle car ?? It's a huge cup of wrong.
And this is what the 4-pot Mustang defenders just don't get. Anyway, most people on this thread are just having a laugh so I think it's all good.
FairmontGS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 08:40 AM   #98
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by FairmontGS View Post
And this is what the 4-pot Mustang defenders just don't get. Anyway, most people on this thread are just having a laugh so I think it's all good.
They've wasted spent the money, they can't whinge about it now.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 09:05 AM   #99
naddis01
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
 
naddis01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,768
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

I don't know about anyone else but I would have a 4 cylinder Mustang any day over any AU.
naddis01 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
9 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 09:13 AM   #100
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,603
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by FairmontGS View Post
And this is what the 4-pot Mustang defenders just don't get. Anyway, most people on this thread are just having a laugh so I think it's all good.
But the laugh is actually on the people who have anything against it...if you dont like it dont comment or judge others for having one....its not rocket science.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 09:17 AM   #101
MAGPIE
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MAGPIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Shakey Isles
Posts: 3,428
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Amazes me how many Richard Craniums there are in the Ford world, especially when comparing stablemates.

The Ecoboost serves a purpose and provides choice and options for buyers.
MAGPIE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2016, 09:37 AM   #102
Wretched
Render unto Caesar
 
Wretched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,245
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAGPIE View Post
Amazes me how many Richard Craniums there are in the Ford world, especially when comparing stablemates.
Hopefully they dwindle off after October.
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Wretched is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 09:45 AM   #103
Sabantien
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 924
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

I honestly don't get why people on the forum act like a car raped their dog if they don't like something about it.

I don't see any reason a 4 cylinder shouldn't be in a bigger car. They're a lot more powerful than they used to be. Hell, i'd give the ecoboost Falcon a go too.

I may not like the EB Mustang if I drive one, and I may not like the GT either. I'd want to drive both before I ever purchase one. But I'm thinking the guy who actually owns one has a better idea about the car than the guy who drove one around the block.

My gf's 1.4 turbo is about as quick as my NA Falcon, and there's things I enjoy about both cars, and things I don't like about both. Can't see the Mustang being any different either.

I'm pretty sure the majority of people hating on them in here also haven't driven one, and it wouldn't matter if they did, because go into it thinking the worst already, you're only going to find negatives.
Sabantien is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
5 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 09:49 AM   #104
Mont5.0
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Donating Member3
 
Mont5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riff
Posts: 12,463
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wretched View Post
Hopefully they dwindle off after October.
AWESOME! A forum full of like minded people with only positve attitudes. Maybe change the name as well..ASF Australian Sheep Forum.
__________________
FGII XR6 IN LIGHTNING STRIKE
R52 SIII IN GUN METALLIC
Mont5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 09:54 AM   #105
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 50,000
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

It can't be that bad, it does circa 400nm torque at a pretty low RPM right?
Franco Cozzo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2016, 09:56 AM   #106
Wretched
Render unto Caesar
 
Wretched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,245
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mont5.0 View Post
AWESOME! A forum full of like minded people with only positve attitudes. Maybe change the name as well..ASF Australian Sheep Forum.
As opposed to the Falcon circle jerk it is right now.
This and several other threads are evidence of rubbish being posted by some only because the car isn't a Falcon.
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Wretched is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 10:23 AM   #107
FairmontGS
WT GT
Donating Member3
 
FairmontGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The GSS
Posts: 17,876
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wretched View Post
As opposed to the Falcon circle jerk it is right now.
This and several other threads are evidence of rubbish being posted by some only because the car isn't a Falcon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal
Some of the post/reactions are either baiting or even more frightening an example of what i was talking about.

Live and let live, they both do skids..geez.

What nimrod compares a $65k+RRP performance sedan to a cut price coupe @ ~$45k.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal
But the laugh is actually on the people who have anything against it...if you dont like it dont comment or judge others for having one....its not rocket science.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAGPIE
Amazes me how many Richard Craniums there are in the Ford world, especially when comparing stablemates.

The Ecoboost serves a purpose and provides choice and options for buyers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wretched
Hopefully they dwindle off after October.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabantien
I honestly don't get why people on the forum act like a car raped their dog if they don't like something about it.

I don't see any reason a 4 cylinder shouldn't be in a bigger car. They're a lot more powerful than they used to be. Hell, i'd give the ecoboost Falcon a go too.

I may not like the EB Mustang if I drive one, and I may not like the GT either. I'd want to drive both before I ever purchase one. But I'm thinking the guy who actually owns one has a better idea about the car than the guy who drove one around the block.

My gf's 1.4 turbo is about as quick as my NA Falcon, and there's things I enjoy about both cars, and things I don't like about both. Can't see the Mustang being any different either.

I'm pretty sure the majority of people hating on them in here also haven't driven one, and it wouldn't matter if they did, because go into it thinking the worst already, you're only going to find negatives.

I tried to lighten it up but... :

Anyway, I think you'll find that you guys are the ones who swung aboard this ship with swords in hands. The OP started a thread about his negative experience with a 4-pot Mustang and how it was (in his opinion wrong) and sought others opinions.

Don't forget to get onto Twitter, Book-face, Pintrest, et al and tell everyone how "outraged" you are...
FairmontGS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2016, 10:24 AM   #108
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

The EB Mustang looks pretty tuff.

My Kelpie-x-Staffie Tonka looks pretty tuff too. He's also neutered.
mcflux is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 10:49 AM   #109
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,603
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by FairmontGS View Post
I tried to lighten it up but... :

Anyway, I think you'll find that you guys are the ones who swung aboard this ship with swords in hands. The OP started a thread about his negative experience with a 4-pot Mustang and how it was (in his opinion wrong) and sought others opinions.

Don't forget to get onto Twitter, Book-face, Pintrest, et al and tell everyone how "outraged" you are...
LOL...what after you stuck your boot in?

And now you are distancing AFF from any other form of social media... Good form from a DM.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 11:18 AM   #110
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by FairmontGS View Post
I tried to lighten it up but... :

Anyway, I think you'll find that you guys are the ones who swung aboard this ship with swords in hands. The OP started a thread about his negative experience with a 4-pot Mustang and how it was (in his opinion wrong) and sought others opinions.

Don't forget to get onto Twitter, Book-face, Pintrest, et al and tell everyone how "outraged" you are...
I know, and all we said was the 4 pot is a POS.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...

Last edited by Sox; 12-08-2016 at 11:43 AM.
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 11:50 AM   #111
STINKY NINJA
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PERTH. WA
Posts: 4,697
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

I only righted a wrong which was stated by the op,people just ran with it lol
An ecoboost mustang will absolutely smoke an na 4.0,thats all,its a proven fact.
The day I see a stock fg xr6 run 13.75 ill eat the shaved hair from my legs haha
STINKY NINJA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 11:53 AM   #112
Trump
bitch lasagne
 
Trump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sonova Beach
Posts: 15,110
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by STINKY NINJA View Post
I only righted a wrong which was stated by the op,people just ran with it lol
An ecoboost mustang will absolutely smoke an na 4.0,thats all,its a proven fact.
The day I see a stock fg xr6 run 13.75 ill eat the shaved hair from my legs haha
But you'll choke on all of that hair...
__________________




Scaled Business Solutions
For Your Small Business IT Needs
Trump is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 01:54 PM   #113
blackf6
R51 Pathy, 91 Jayco Swan
 
blackf6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mackay, QLD
Posts: 3,635
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

I would buy one. Wouldn't be too bad. Rip the eb out. Stick a Barra in, or maybe a Boss 290. Cars can always be improved. I am sure the Mericans have wound the boost up, changed the rotating assembly, and are actually running good numbers. Got to be better than a Camira, or Starfire Four Commo.
blackf6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 04:47 PM   #114
chopstar87
The Original ChopstaR
 
chopstar87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 277
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Do guys know that the ecoboost have an output of 233kw right?? some of you sound like you think its like a little buzz box with 150kw or something...

The Ecoboost mustang weights 1627kgs (Tare) 233kw @ 5700rpm / 432nm @ 3000rpm
FG-X Falcon Xr6 NA weights 1703kgs (tare) 195kw @ 6000rpm / 391nm @ 3250rpm

To say a NA Xr6 would beat one or anything like that is ridiculous... and would be more based on emotion then fact.. you love the falcon, that's great, we get it, but doesn't mean you need trash the Eco Mustang.

blah blah blah.. 4 pot shouldn't be in a mustang.. but the 4pot has more power and torque then the 6.. it would have been stupid to bring the 6 here, as it would have been less powerful and less rewarding then the 4 pot. seriously guys.. its 2016.. not back in nam where a 4 pot was gutless.
__________________
Car History:

May 2006 – October 2006: 2002 Proton Persona
October 2006 – July 2013: 2004 BA Ford Falcon XR6 (Blueprint – 4 speed Auto – Premium Audio - No Tracton Control )
July 2013 - ???: 2013 Chrysler 300c Luxury (Bright white – Panoramic Sunroof – 19 speaker 900 watt Harmon/Kardon stereo)
November 2013 - ???: 2013 Ford Focus Sport (the missus's car, white, manual)
chopstar87 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
7 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 04:54 PM   #115
Junkyard-Dog
*barks incessantly
 
Junkyard-Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: SA
Posts: 1,567
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by M&Ms View Post
Aaah you're a skater boy, explains a lot.....
Yes. That post was intended to be taken in a literal sense, rather than as a sarcastic jab at the fact that you do not have the basis to substantiate your claims about running a 13.1 - 13.3 quarter mile.

...but, I'm just a skater boy. She said seeya later boy.
Junkyard-Dog is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 05:47 PM   #116
99AUXR
Brad
 
99AUXR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,827
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Installing starter motor advice on ba / bf 6cyc Falcon. 
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junkyard-Dog View Post
...but, I'm just a skater boy. She said seeya later boy.
Nice mate!

This thread is a joke the car probably sells better than the falcon anyway... Sadly :(
__________________
Silhouette BF MKII F6
Plazmaman Intercooler Kit, ID1000, 34mm Internal Wastegate and Turbosmart Actuator, Tein Coilovers, Focal Audio, XXR 521 18x8.5 18x10
99AUXR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 05:48 PM   #117
SumoDog68
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,128
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

UK Top Gear nails it :

http://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/f...dr/first-drive
SumoDog68 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 06:56 PM   #118
DFB FGXR6
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
DFB FGXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,295
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For the excellent car-care guide 
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

As I mentioned in another thread, the EB Mustang is great vehicle, and some ways is a modern day Nissan 200SX.

Having driven one, there can be doubting its speed, the engine is strong from idle to redline.

What lets the EcoBoost down is the lack of character. The engine lacks that vital sound a performance car should have. It sounds like a Focus.

Again, its a great package, but the lacks the WOW factory as a drive experience.
__________________
The Fleet -
2016 PX MK II Ranger Cool White
2008 FG XR6 Sensation Blue
2014 FG X XR8 Emperor Red
2024 Mustang GT Race Red

The Departed -
2002 T3 TS50 Blueprint
2017 Mustang GT Race Red
DFB FGXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 12-08-2016, 07:07 PM   #119
nstg8a
3..2..1..
 
nstg8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bellbird park
Posts: 7,218
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFB FGXR6 View Post
As I mentioned in another thread, the EB Mustang is great vehicle, and some ways is a modern day Nissan 200SX.

Having driven one, there can be doubting its speed, the engine is strong from idle to redline.

What lets the EcoBoost down is the lack of character. The engine lacks that vital sound a performance car should have. It sounds like a Focus.

Again, its a great package, but the lacks the WOW factory as a drive experience.
Decent exhaust would probably do it wonders.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by pottery beige View Post
Happy mcgadget meal orphan mcboofhead
nstg8a is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-08-2016, 07:16 PM   #120
duaned
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
duaned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Macquarie, Newcastle NSW
Posts: 3,164
Default Re: Drove a mustang 2.3 turbo..

Someone better tell those engineers to pick up the remaining 4 pistons they left on the ground.
duaned is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL