Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-05-2012, 09:59 PM   #61
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
It can tow 300kg

You could probably hook up a trailer to it but not put anything in it.
You could fill it with smug!
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-05-2012, 10:07 PM   #62
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 8,906
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Yeah really only suitable for a jetski, motorbike or bicycles.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-05-2012, 10:13 PM   #63
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6 Martin
Yeah really only suitable for a jetski, motorbike or bicycles.
Or taking rubbish to the dump.
Or doing a Bunnings run.
Or moving a fridge or washing machine.
Or really just about 90% of actual trailer use by ordinary people.......
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-05-2012, 10:14 PM   #64
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
Or taking rubbish to the dump.
Or doing a Bunnings run.
Or moving a fridge or washing machine.
Or really just about 90% of actual trailer use by ordinary people.......

Taking up 3 parking spaces at Bunnings...
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-05-2012, 12:30 AM   #65
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 8,906
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
Or taking rubbish to the dump.
Or doing a Bunnings run.
Or moving a fridge or washing machine.
Or really just about 90% of actual trailer use by ordinary people.......
Your average 6x4 box trailer starts at 250kg, so I think you'll find the Camry isnt designed to pull them.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-05-2012, 06:46 AM   #66
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
Taking up 3 parking spaces at Bunnings...

So your average Toyota driver then?
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-05-2012, 07:37 AM   #67
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,255
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by flappist
Or taking rubbish to the dump.
Or doing a Bunnings run.
Or moving a fridge or washing machine.
Or really just about 90% of actual trailer use by ordinary people.......
Yes, thank you flappist, most people don't need to tow 2300 kg, something like 1200-1600 is adequate..
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-05-2012, 09:19 AM   #68
Brazen
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Brazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

The Camry looks like a good buy especially considering the expensive hybrid tech, as well as keyless start and reversing camera. But what were they thinking about the tow rating. Toyota stated that the biggest complaint in Australia was lack of tow rating, they said up to 80% of large cars have tow bars and they even flew Japanese engineers out to drive around Australian cities to show how many cars are towing or have tow bars. So after all that they lump it with a 300kg rating? Surely the drivetrain can handle 1000kg?
Brazen is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-05-2012, 10:34 AM   #69
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 8,906
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Id say its got to do with the regenerative braking system, probably cant cope with much extra load.

But as I said, most Hybrid drivers probably arnt interested in towing a car trailer with a broken down Falcon on the back. A bike rack or a jet ski is probably the most they'll use it for.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-05-2012, 06:01 PM   #70
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,455
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6 Martin
But as I said, most Hybrid drivers probably arnt interested in towing a car trailer
they probably have 7 recycle bins and 3 for green waste.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-05-2012, 07:35 PM   #71
Buntz
Straight Eight
 
Buntz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by sudszy
Ben, just as the journalist has, you are confusing volumetric consumption with efficiency.

Basically when we are looking at the efficiency of a fuel we are looking at how much of the energy in that fuel can be converted to useful work in the engine. The figures are better for dedicated lpg engines running higher compression.

Also appreciate that per kg lpg contains more energy than petrol, so a car will travel further on a kg of lpg than petrol.
If you factor in what a car is/needs, there is a limited space to store a fuel. So considering that Petrol has more energy per volume, rather than weight, it could be argued that it is more efficient as a packaged catalyst than LPG.
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon.
Buntz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-05-2012, 08:12 PM   #72
sudszy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 776
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buntz93ED
it could be argued that it is more efficient as a packaged catalyst than LPG.
Certainly, as flappist pointed out, uranium would also beat either by more than just a couple of orders of magnitude for joules/kg or joules/litre, but you have lost me with the 'packaged catalyst"?
sudszy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-05-2012, 08:54 PM   #73
Burnout
Falcon RTV - FG G6ET
Donating Member3
 
Burnout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In Da Bush, QLD
Posts: 31,192
Default Re: AGE/SMH comparison of Ecoboost, traditional petrol. LPG and Hybrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by sudszy
Certainly, as flappist pointed out, uranium would also beat either by more than just a couple of orders of magnitude for joules/kg or joules/litre, but you have lost me with the 'packaged catalyst"?
Oh, dear! Where have you been?
__________________
BAII RTV - with Raptor V S/C.

RTV Power
FG G6ET 50th Anniversary in Sensation.
While the basic Ford Six was code named Barra, the Turbo version clearly deserved its very own moniker – again enter Gordon Barfield.
We asked him if the engine had actually been called “Seagull” and how that came about.
“Actually it was just call “Gull”, because I named it that. Because we knew it was going to poo on everything”.
Burnout is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL